Final Cut Pro requires an operating system of 10 or higher on the Mac with 4 gigabytes of available RAM and an OpenCL-capable graphics card. You'll also need 256 megabytes of VRAM for 4K and 3D titles and about 4 gigabytes or more space. For Adobe Premiere, you need a Pentium 4 or above as well as an AMD Athlon 64 processor with 64-bit support. How professional editors select Final Cut Pro X or Adobe Premiere Pro X to edit their videosFind out more about CleanMyMac X http://bit.ly/cleanmymacstalmanL. The most video editors nowadays use Final Cut Pro X or Adobe Premiere Pro. But how professionals select which one to use for video editing? Adobe Premiere Pro CC. Adobe Premiere Pro CC is our favorite video editor. It has everything you.
Cover image via
Deciding between Adobe Creative Cloud, Final Cut Pro X and Avid for pro video editing? Here are a few thoughts and opinions to help you make that call.
As a decade-long loyal and faithful FCP editor, the time seems to be coming of the true death of FCP7. When you start to encounter workflow slowdowns and workarounds that would not otherwise be needed when working in up-to-date applications, it feels like it's time to start looking around at other options.
The options are still basically what they were five years ago — Apple, Avid, and Adobe. But while that hasn't changed, other things have.
Apple dropped the FCPX launch so spectacularly it is still embedded in the popular consciousness (even though FCPX has come a long way since then). Adobe is freaking people out with their Cloud move. And Media Composer is chugging along, (possibly with company-wide financial difficulties), but is still seen by many as the only choice for large institution-sized outfits.
There have been many discussions online and off in the last two years about the merits of Final Cut Pro X versus other video editing applications. This post is not intended to prove which video editing system is the best, but rather look at considerations of each and how it may affect your choice of primary application.
So, what is an editor to do?
Well my first thought would be to download the free trial of each app, cut something on it, and see how you go. Googling articles like this one probably won't supply you with the information you're really after — what's it like to actually use the video editing program? However, articles like this one can supply you with other useful information and resources, so do keep reading! Windows connect phone to pc.
Budget: Premiere Pro vs. Final Cut Pro X vs. Avid Media Composer
If you're a cost-conscious creative, then what does the scenario look like? Avid Media Composer is now available for a steady $999 and comes with Sorenson Squeeze thrown in. You pay once and you can keep it forever. Avid are still releasing free point patches for old versions, and upgrading between versions will cost you a small fee (the upgrade from Media Composer version 6.5 to 7 is $299).
The cost of Final Cut Pro X, purchased via the Mac App Store, is only $299.99. Motion 5 and Compressor 4 are both $49.99. Again, you get to keep the software for as long as you like and (so far) all of the updates to FCPX have been free.
Adobe currently has two options available. Buy a suite of software like Production Premium CS6 for $1899 or move to the Creative Cloud versions for $49.99 a month. With Adobe CC New linux software 2017. , you've got access to every single Adobe application, plus 2GB of online storage. So, how does that shake out in the long run?
If you bought Production Premium CS 6 and kept it for three years it would cost you $1899. $49.99 a month for three years is $1,799.64.
If you only want one application like After Effects CS6 ($999), Photoshop CS6 ($699) or Premiere Pro CS6 ($799) as a single app, CC rental ($19.99/month) after three years that would be $719.64.
In product development terms, even three years is a long time. So if Adobe does not increase their monthly prices, and this quote from VP of Professional Business in Adobe's Digital Media Business Unit Mala Sharma seems to try to allay those fears, then moving to the Cloud could save you a few bucks and keep you up to date.
My only rational response to that is that we can't [push up prices]… It's in our best interests to win our customers' trust – as every month they're going to be choosing whether they want to stay engaged with us or not. We have never been more vulnerable, in my opinion, than in [moving to a subscription model]. It's a really big bet.
But Adobe's Creative Cloud is still more expensive than either of the other two competing video editing options (though that's not a fair direct comparison when you consider the number of applications involved).
Common Opinions
The Internet is awash with opinions on whether or not to move to the Creative Cloud — just check out the number of comments each of these articles has generated. Oliver Peters, who's usually right on the money, offer this cautious recommendation:
My suggestion for most users in similar shoes would be to buy one of the CS6 bundles now as a perpetual license. This gives you a fallback position. Then if you want to move forward with the Cloud, run the numbers. If you are a power user of Photoshop, Premiere Pro or After Effects and want to have the latest version of that one application, simply buy a single-application subscription. If you use three or more applications on a regular basis and want those all to be current, then the full Creative Cloud subscription makes sense. You still have the CS6 versions if needed, as long as you've maintain backwards project compatibility.
Aharon Rabinowitz has written a couple of excellent blog posts (Part 1 and Part 2) that cover his opinions, interactions with Adobe, and his readers' thoughts. It's worth reading through the blog posts (if not all the comments), as Rabinowitz covers quite a few of the common concerns creatives are raising.
Jahron Schneider from Fstoppers also walks through the Adobe Creative Cloud maze and comes out in favor of it:
If the software and delivery of that software makes your life easier, it's a good thing right? That's what you should focus on when contemplating the Creative Cloud, because it does make your life easier. I'm comfortable saying that the Creative Cloud is better for Adobe and better for the consumers. It's a great service, and one I'll continue to use.
For a short video covering the major new features in Adobe CC (and a few extra thoughts on the future of FCPX), check out this post-NAB 2013 comparison between FCPX and Adobe CC.
What About the Future of Final Cut Pro X?
A lot of pros still claim FCPX is unusable, and although the Coen Brothers might be moving to Premiere for their next feature, plenty of other folks are cutting 4K feature films in FCPX. Apple is working hard to frequently update FCPX, and with the growth of third party apps, more and more one-man-band operations are embracing the affordable app.
One of the people who has shared their FCPX workflow in detail is Sam Mestman. If you want to see FCPX with fresh eyes, check out his presentation below.
As a quick nod to Avid Media Composer 7, you can check out the official MC7 site listing all the new features from Avid and also this quick round up from NAB 2013.
As the FCPX launch proved, things in this industry can change quickly and dramatically. Knowing every system well has distinct advantages. Mercalli 4 0 278 1. If you're a one-man band or small post house, you'll want to choose a video editing application and stick with it for a few years.
Which NLE is your favorite and why? Share your opinions and experiences in the comments below!
This debate has been going on for a long, long time.
Which one is better — Adobe Premiere Pro or the classic Apple program, Final Cut Pro X?
While Premiere Pro is one of the most advanced video editing software on the internet, Final Cut Pro X has its own traditional fan following and trumps the Adobe giant in a few areas.
But in this post, I'm gonna end this debate once and for all.
I'm gonna pass both the programs through different parameters and in the end, you'll know which tool is actually the king of the ring.
So, let's see how these two prodigies stack up against each other.
'How I'm going to use this software?'
That's the very first question that comes to an average users' mind while buying a video editing software.
And that's quite natural considering the complicated nature of a typical editing program. Seems like Premiere Pro and Final Cut Pro follow the same tradition.
Both the software are designed for intermediate or experienced users and require some serious effort and time from amateurs to learn the ropes.
However, Final Cut Pro looks slightly underwhelming and cleaner at first glance compared to its Adobe counterpart.
As soon as you open the program, it asks you to create a project, name it, and set the resolution and frame speed.
Once you've done that, you land on the actual editing area where you see a timeline at the bottom of your screen and a preview area on the center.
The left side of your screen in Final Cut Pro is where you find most of the editing functions and the files you've imported to edit or add to your project.
And finally, the control settings are mainly on the right side where you can regulate the intensity of the different editing features.
Now, Premiere Pro, on the other hand, has a busy user interface.
The first screen, as usual, asks you to create a project and save it on your computer.
And once you go past it, you come across the UI which has the same multitrack timeline at the bottom of the screen like Final Cut Pro.
On the left, we have a small project panel that displays all the files you've imported to the software. A source panel is just above it where you can playback the files in Project panel before you edit or add these files to your project.
The main preview area is on the extreme right side of the screen, and unlike, Final Cut Pro, many of the editing features are placed with the timeline. It's on the left-hand side of the timeline.
What Is Final Cut Pro X
Of course, the placement of toolbar is handy for veteran users, but those who have migrated to Premiere Pro from another program might find it a little awkward, at first.
Other than the UI, almost everything is the same on both the tools.
You get built-in tutorials in both the programs to assist you throughout your editing journey. And It takes a couple of clicks or drag & drop movement to perform any function on either of the software.
So, who's the winner?
It's a tight decision, but Final Cut Pro has a slight edge over Premiere Pro in this section because the UI is relatively simple and easy to navigate. While the Premiere Pro interface is a bit overwhelming.
Winner: Final Cut Pro X
The number of editing functions is the most vital factor to decide whether you should invest in a tool or skip it.
And once again, we have a neck-to-neck fight between these two titans.
Just like any standard editing tool, both the programs are more than efficient in performing basic-level functions like cropping, trimming, cutting, mixing, and more.
But as you move towards the more advanced features, some minor differences come into the scene.
For example, while Premiere Pro doesn't explicitly mention the total number of angles it covers in the multicam editing mode, Final Cut Pro enables you to watch and edit your clips from 16 different angles in one go.
That's insane!
Similarly, Premiere Pro is slightly better than Final Cut Pro in making animation movies or editing 3D clips and objects.
Though Final Cut Pro also enables you to work on 3D projects and add 3D titles to your standard videos, you don't see anything beyond that.
On the other hand, Premiere Pro is loaded with specific effects and transitions that you can include in your animated movies or 3D videos.
What's more?
Since Premiere Pro is integrated with other Creative Cloud tools, it's incredibly easy to send your files to Adobe Elements or After Effects, create some exclusive VFX there, and jump back on to Premiere Pro to add them to your project.
That gives it a slight edge over Final Cut Pro when it comes to adding effects and transitions.
Apart from this, everything else like color grading, audio mixing, editing VR videos, etc. are almost the same in both the software.
You get a complete 360° package in either of the tools where you not only can view the VR footages in their original state, but also can stitch, trim, or add VR videos without any snag.
Final Cut Pro X Trial
Deputy dangle 1 0. All of these features are followed by the special VR effects and the power to stabilize jittery clips shot during an action.
So, which tool rules this section?
Adobe Premiere Pro emerge victorious in this fight because:
- It works more efficiently with 3D videos and…
- Enables you to flip back and forth between other CC tools without leaving the software. Final Cut Pro also has some integration options available, but they're not as powerful as the Creative Cloud software.
Winner: Adobe Premiere Pro
Supporting 4K UHD videos is a norm in almost all the editing programs. And it's not a surprise to know both, Final Cut and Premiere Pro, are well capable of opening and editing 4K clips.
But they don't just stop here. They go a step ahead.
While Premiere Pro allows you to work on 8K resolution clips, Final Cut Pro is not far behind, too. You can open and edit 6K resolution videos using the Apple video editing software.
Similarly, it's the same when you check for sharing options.
Both the tools have this built-in publish to share facility, where you can format and share videos on different platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and Vimeo straight from within the software.
You also get the luxury to burn your movies into DVDs or Blu-ray disc in case there's an offline requirement.
Now, since we have no clear winner of this round, we can declare it a tie.
Result: Tie
Device compatibility and cloud storage are the only areas where we see a clear dominance from one tool.
To start with device compatibility, Apple Final Cut Pro X, as the name goes, is developed only for Mac computers.
The only silver lining is the generous license policy of Apple that lets you run the program on all the MacOS devices that you own.
On the other side, Premiere Pro works fine on Windows as well as MacOS devices. Though the license policy is a bit strict and restricts you to install the software only on two computers.
Similarly, Premiere Pro has a clear upper hand when it comes to cloud storage.
While you get 2 GB of cloud storage during the trial period, that number can surge up drastically and range anywhere between 25GB – 1TB according to the membership plan you choose.
Unfortunately, Final Cut Pro doesn't offer cloud space exclusively to its users, but you can at least save your files in iCloud.
So, the winner of this round is…
Adobe Premiere Pro.
Adobe premiere pro 2014 system requirements. Winner: Adobe Premiere Pro
So far, things have been even-steven, but price is the biggest differentiator between these two giants.
Final Cut and Premiere Pro follow two different pricing models.
While Final Cut comes with a one-off price tag of $299, Premiere Pro is a little expensive and requires you to sign up for a monthly/yearly subscription plan.
As per the membership plans of Adobe, the least expensive is their 'Single App' plan that costs you only $20/month when billed annually and includes 100GB of cloud storage.
So, the upfront amount you pay comes down to $240, and you will have to pay it every year to continue reaping the benefits of the tool without any hindrance.
And to be honest, I prefer the one-off pricing option because you pay once and keep the tool for your entire life.
http://rtvalp.xtgem.com/Blog/__xtblog_entry/19154092-medweigh-ms-2510-manual#xt_blog. So, the winner of this round is, undoubtedly, Apple Final Cut Pro X.
Winner: Apple Final Cut Pro X
The final score reads 2-2.
2 points for Premiere Pro, 2 for Final Cut Pro, and a tie. That indicates how tight the race was.
Now, everything boils down to this question:
Which is better – Adobe Premiere Pro or Apple Final Cut Pro X?
And honestly speaking, we don't have a clear winner per se.
Final Cut Pro X Manual
Even though both the programs are almost equal in editing prowess and usability, they would attract two different kinds of users.
The first category belongs to those who want a tool that works perfectly fine on Windows and Mac computer, need cloud space, and are able to pay a substantial amount of money every year.
Adobe Premiere is the perfect companion for such users.
On the flip side, users who work only on Mac computers, don't care much about cloud storage and prefer one-off pricing over recurring payment would love Apple Final Cut Pro X.
Finally, it doesn't matter which program you choose, you can never go wrong with either of them.
